ایچ آر سی پی کا لاہور کے تھانے میں دو خواتین کی ہلاکت پر جوڈیشل کمیشن بنانے کا مطالبہ

**LAHORE POLICE CRISIS: Human Rights Commission Demands Judicial Probe into Women's Deaths**

The Human Rights Commission of Pakistan (HRCP) has called for an independent judicial inquiry into the deaths of two women, Amna and Inamul, who were allegedly killed in police custody in Lahore's Thana Town area. The HRCP's demand comes after a fact-finding report highlighted multiple discrepancies in the official account and the family's statement regarding the circumstances surrounding their deaths.

Background & Context

The incident took place on August 4, when the two women were taken into police custody on suspicion of theft. Within hours, they were reported dead. The police initially attributed their deaths to heart attacks, but the final post-mortem reports have yet to be made public, leaving the cause of death unclear.

The HRCP's fact-finding mission has raised concerns about the lack of transparency in the police's handling of the case, citing inconsistencies in the official statements and the family's accounts of the events leading up to the women's deaths. The report has also questioned the police's claims that the women were addicted to narcotics, pointing out that there is no evidence to support these allegations.

Key Details

The HRCP's fact-finding report has highlighted several key points, including the lack of Lady Police officers during the women's detention, the delay in informing the family, and the police's control over the post-mortem, autopsy, and burial procedures. The report has also raised questions about the police's initial claim that the women died of heart attacks, pointing out that the final post-mortem reports have yet to be made public.

The HRCP has also pointed out that the family's account of the women's deaths contradicts the official version, with the family claiming that the women's bodies showed signs of physical trauma and dried blood, which were not mentioned in the official records.

What Experts Say

According to HRCP Chairperson Asad Iqbal Butt, the discrepancies in the official account and the family's statement highlight the need for transparent and independent investigations into the case. Butt emphasized that the HRCP's demand for an independent judicial inquiry is based on the need for a thorough and impartial investigation into the circumstances surrounding the women's deaths.

Key Takeaways

• Multiple discrepancies in the official account and the family's statement have raised concerns about the police's handling of the case.
• The HRCP has demanded an independent judicial inquiry into the deaths of the two women, citing the need for transparent and impartial investigations.
• The police's claims that the women were addicted to narcotics have been questioned, with the HRCP pointing out that there is no evidence to support these allegations.
• The family's account of the women's deaths contradicts the official version, with the family claiming that the women's bodies showed signs of physical trauma and dried blood.

What This Means For You

The HRCP's demand for an independent judicial inquiry into the deaths of the two women highlights the need for transparency and accountability in the police's handling of cases involving custodial deaths. This means that families of victims of custodial deaths should be informed promptly and transparently about the circumstances surrounding their loved ones' deaths.

It also means that the police should be held accountable for their actions, and that independent investigations should be conducted to ensure that justice is served. The HRCP's call for an independent judicial inquiry is a step in the right direction, and it is hoped that the authorities will take it seriously and act accordingly.

For the sake of justice and accountability, it is essential that we demand transparency and independent investigations into cases involving custodial deaths. This is not only a matter of human rights, but also a matter of ensuring that our law enforcement agencies are accountable to the public they serve.