Generative AI's Dark Side: A Growing Backlash Against Unwanted Features
As we continue to navigate the complex and rapidly evolving landscape of artificial intelligence, it's becoming increasingly clear that the benefits of generative AI are not being felt by everyone. In fact, many Americans are feeling a growing sense of frustration and disillusionment with the technology, particularly when it comes to features that seem to be popping up without their consent. For some, the final straw came when they discovered that they could be impersonated online using AI deepfakes, without any way to opt out or control who could create and share these digital doppelgangers.
Background & Context
Generative AI, which uses machine learning algorithms to create new content based on patterns and data, has been hailed as a revolutionary technology with the potential to transform industries and improve lives. However, as the technology has become more widespread and sophisticated, concerns have grown about its impact on individuals and society as a whole. From AI-generated fake news and deepfakes to biased algorithms and data exploitation, the list of potential drawbacks is long and worrisome.
One of the key drivers of the backlash against generative AI is the feeling that many people have that they never consented to the use of their data for AI model training. Social media platforms, search engines, and other online services have all been accused of scraping users' data without their knowledge or permission, and using it to create AI-generated content that is then presented to them as if it were real. This has led to a growing sense of mistrust and frustration among many users, who feel that they are being treated as nothing more than data points in a vast and complex system.
Key Details
A recent Gallup poll found that as Americans become more familiar with generative AI, their attitudes towards the technology become increasingly negative. In fact, almost half of young people between the ages of 18 and 29 see generative AI as doing more harm than good, while many others express concerns about the potential impact on jobs, society, and the environment. Companies are starting to take notice of these concerns, and are beginning to take steps to address them.
For example, LinkedIn has introduced a "seems like AI slop" button that allows users to report AI-generated content on the platform, while Snapchat has announced that fully AI-generated videos will no longer be eligible for its discovery feed. Substack, a platform for writers and creators, has also introduced an AI detection tool to help police writers who may be using AI-generated content without proper disclosure.
While these moves are a step in the right direction, many experts believe that more needs to be done to address the concerns of users. "Consent is really important," says Meredith Broussard, a data journalism professor at New York University and author of Artificial Unintelligence: How Computers Misunderstand the World. "We can connect that to the way that women, queer people, people of color, and minorities get exploited and abused online. Tech companies have never really been sensitive to issues of consent."
What Experts Say
According to Nick Seaver, an associate professor of anthropology at Tufts University who focuses on technology and society, the AI revolution has been marked by a lack of transparency and accountability. "They just roll them out and see what sticks, because nobody really knows what this is for," he says. "It's a classic example of how technology companies operate – they push out new features and see how users react, without really thinking through the potential consequences."
Key Takeaways
- Generative AI is becoming increasingly widespread, but many users are feeling a growing sense of frustration and disillusionment with the technology.
- Concerns about AI-generated fake news, deepfakes, biased algorithms, and data exploitation are driving the backlash against generative AI.
- Companies are starting to take notice of these concerns, and are beginning to take steps to address them, such as introducing AI detection tools and changing their policies around AI-generated content.
- More needs to be done to address the concerns of users, including greater transparency and accountability from technology companies.
What This Means For You
As the debate around generative AI continues to rage, it's essential that users take control of their own data and online experiences. This means being vigilant about the features and services that are being pushed out to you, and speaking up if you have concerns about the impact of AI on your life. It also means demanding greater transparency and accountability from technology companies, and pushing for policies that protect your rights and interests.
Ultimately, the future of generative AI will depend on the choices we make as a society. Will we allow these technologies to continue to be developed and deployed without adequate safeguards and regulations, or will we take a more thoughtful and considered approach that prioritizes the needs and concerns of users? The answer to this question will have a profound impact on the world we live in, and it's up to us to ensure that we get it right.
.png)

English (US) ·