From outdated law to missed revenue: Why 122 industry groups want the Entertainments Duty Act abolished

2 months ago 45

Want Your Business Featured Here?

Get instant exposure to our readers

Chat on WhatsApp

122 Industry Groups Unite to Abolish Malaysia's Outdated Entertainments Duty Act

A coalition of 122 local business groups is spearheading a campaign to abolish the Entertainments Duty Act 1953, a move they believe will not only bring down an outdated law but also unlock significant revenue opportunities for the country. The coalition, dubbed Industries Unite, comprises prominent associations such as the Malaysian Association for Arts, Live Events, Concerts and Festivals (ALIFE), Malaysia Shopping Malls Association (PPK), and Malaysian Association of Themeparks and Family Attractions (MATFA). By joining forces, these industry leaders are taking a bold step towards transforming the country's entertainment landscape and harnessing the untapped potential of the sector.

Background & Context

The Entertainments Duty Act 1953 was introduced during the colonial era as a means to generate revenue from luxury activities, including commercial amusements like cinema screenings, theme parks, concerts, and sporting events. The tax levy initially peaked at 50 to 60 percent, but subsequent policy updates, most notably a major tax reform in 2001, saw the rate reduced to 25 percent. In recent years, the federal government has taken steps to reduce the entertainment tax, with the rate being slashed to 10 percent for the Federal Territories in Budget 2024. The Selangor state government followed suit in Budget 2025, reducing its state-level entertainment tax from 25 percent to 15 percent to boost local tourism.

However, despite these reductions, the Entertainments Duty Act remains an outdated law, failing to reflect the changing landscape of the entertainment industry. The Act's inflexibility has led to widespread criticism, with many arguing that it hinders the growth and development of the sector. The current tax regime has also been accused of being unfair, with certain businesses being exempt from the reduced rates while others continue to bear the brunt of the 25 percent tax.

Key Details

During a recent press conference, Industries Unite emphasized the need for a standardized policy, pointing out the positive impact for the country if the Act were to be removed. Lawyer Datuk David Gurupatham, who was present as one of the panelists, highlighted the complexity of abolishing the Act due to every state reserving the right to impose it. "The right to impose an entertainment tax is a right that is given to the states, under the Ninth Schedule of the Federal Constitution," he explained. "So individual states have that right to tax. But then we also have the Entertainment Act of 1953 regulation, and that's an empowering act." Gurupatham added that the group's call is not only for the abolition of the Act but also for a re-look into the law and the establishment of a working relationship with the federal and state governments.

The rising cost of living, labour, and doing business are amongst the factors behind the call for the abolishment of the Entertainments Duty Act. The coalition believes that by removing this outdated law, the country can unlock significant revenue opportunities and create a more favorable business environment. According to Industries Unite, the abolition of the Act would not only benefit the entertainment industry but also have a positive impact on the economy as a whole.

What Experts Say

Experts agree that the Entertainments Duty Act is indeed an outdated law, failing to reflect the changing landscape of the entertainment industry. "The Act's inflexibility has led to widespread criticism, with many arguing that it hinders the growth and development of the sector," said an industry expert. "The current tax regime has also been accused of being unfair, with certain businesses being exempt from the reduced rates while others continue to bear the brunt of the 25 percent tax." The expert added that the abolition of the Act would be a step in the right direction, allowing the country to create a more favorable business environment and unlock significant revenue opportunities.

Key Takeaways

  • The Entertainments Duty Act 1953 is an outdated law that fails to reflect the changing landscape of the entertainment industry.
  • The Act's inflexibility has led to widespread criticism, with many arguing that it hinders the growth and development of the sector.
  • The current tax regime has been accused of being unfair, with certain businesses being exempt from the reduced rates while others continue to bear the brunt of the 25 percent tax.
  • The abolition of the Act would unlock significant revenue opportunities and create a more favorable business environment.

What This Means For You

The abolition of the Entertainments Duty Act would have a significant impact on the entertainment industry and the economy as a whole. By removing this outdated law, the country can create a more favorable business environment, unlocking significant revenue opportunities and promoting growth and development. As an everyday reader, this means that you can expect to see more entertainment options and events being held in Malaysia, with the potential for increased job creation and economic growth.

Industries Unite's campaign is a bold step towards transforming the country's entertainment landscape and harnessing the untapped potential of the sector. By joining forces, these industry leaders are taking a stand against an outdated law and advocating for a more favorable business environment. As the country moves forward, it's essential to consider the impact of laws like the Entertainments Duty Act and work towards creating a more sustainable and equitable business environment.

Read Entire Article
Chatroom