Election Denialism in California: Top Official Seeks to Hire Convicted Election Interferer Tina Peters

Shocking revelations have emerged from Shasta County, California, where the top election official, Clint Curtis, has sparked outrage by announcing plans to hire a new deputy: Tina Peters, the election denial superstar who was convicted of seven counts related to election interference in 2024 and sentenced to nine years in prison. The move has left many in the community reeling, with some questioning the motivations behind this unexpected appointment.

Background & Context

Shasta County, a deep-red enclave in Northern California, has become a hotbed of election denial conspiracy theories over the past six years, with many of these theories being promoted by former President Donald Trump and his supporters. The county's history of promoting these conspiracy theories has raised concerns among election officials and experts, who worry that this appointment could further erode trust in the electoral process.

The recent appointment of Clint Curtis as the top election official in Shasta County has also raised eyebrows, given his decades-long history of promoting election-related conspiracy theories. Curtis first came to national prominence over two decades ago, when he claimed to have created a software program that could rig elections without election officials being able to notice anything amiss.

Key Details

According to sources, Curtis plans to hire Tina Peters as his new deputy, despite her conviction on seven counts related to election interference. Peters' lawyer, Peter Ticktin, has confirmed that she is considering the offer, citing concerns about the way the election was handled in Shasta County. However, Curtis has refused to specify what Peters' duties would include, sparking further concerns about the potential implications of this appointment.

Peters was convicted of allowing unauthorized access to election equipment in Mesa County, Colorado, as part of a scheme to prove that the 2020 presidential election had been stolen from Donald Trump. Her conviction was later commuted by Colorado governor Jared Polis after months of pressure from President Trump, who purported to have issued his own pardon despite Peters being convicted on state charges.

What Experts Say

Experts have expressed alarm at the potential implications of this appointment, warning that it could further erode trust in the electoral process. "This is a classic case of appointing someone who has a history of promoting election denialism to a position of power," said one election expert. "It's a recipe for disaster, and it's likely to further polarize the community and undermine trust in the electoral process."

Others have pointed out that the appointment of Tina Peters could have broader implications for the electoral process, particularly in the lead-up to the 2028 presidential election. "This appointment sends a message that election denialism is still a viable and acceptable approach to electoral politics," said another expert. "It's a concerning trend that could have far-reaching consequences for the integrity of our electoral process."

Key Takeaways

• Shasta County's top election official, Clint Curtis, has announced plans to hire Tina Peters as his new deputy, despite her conviction on seven counts related to election interference.
• Curtis has refused to specify what Peters' duties would include, sparking concerns about the potential implications of this appointment.
• Peters was convicted of allowing unauthorized access to election equipment in Mesa County, Colorado, as part of a scheme to prove that the 2020 presidential election had been stolen from Donald Trump.
• Experts have expressed alarm at the potential implications of this appointment, warning that it could further erode trust in the electoral process.

What This Means For You

This appointment has significant implications for the electoral process, particularly in the lead-up to the 2028 presidential election. It's essential for voters to remain vigilant and demand transparency and accountability from election officials. If you're concerned about the integrity of the electoral process, we urge you to contact your local election officials and express your concerns.

By staying informed and engaged, we can work together to ensure that our electoral process remains fair, transparent, and trustworthy. The fate of our democracy depends on it.